Brexit NOT to blame! Remoaners silenced as economist pinpoints fatal flaw in logic

UK economic crisis 'has little to do with Brexit' says Rees-Mogg

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info

As families across the UK struggle to make ends meet amid the cost of living crisis, the state of the UK economy, and Brexit’s impact on it, has become a subject of fierce debate. Richard Jones, Professor of Material Physics and Innovation Policy at the University of Manchester, argued there was a key factor many commentators appear to be missing out. Using data from the Office for National Statistics, Professor Jones argued stagnant wages and a slow economy is primarily the consequence of the global financial crisis in 2008 – not Brexit nor the Covid pandemic.

Mr Jones said: “The fundamental problem of the UK economy, predating Brexit and Covid, remains the collapse in productivity growth since the global financial crisis.

“This underlies stagnant wage growth, struggles to fund public services adequately, and arguably our sour politics”.

He went on to reference the Living Standards Audit 2022, published by the Resolution Foundation. This study pointed to consistent low growth in the UK economy as a significant contributing factor to the current struggle many families are now facing.

The think-tank said in its report: “Britain has experienced a toxic combination of both low growth and persistently high income inequality, and this has led to some groups being particularly exposed to the cost-of-living crisis.”

Productivity stagnation in the UK was further evidenced by a recently published report from the Productivity Commission, a group established by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

Its report stated: “For three decades after the Second World War, during the “golden age” for the world economy, productivity, measured by output per hour worked, grew by an average of 3.6 percent a year.

“In the next three decades, it was just over 2 percent — a figure we have come to associate with long-term productivity growth for the UK.

“But then, around the time of the financial crisis, the lights went out.

“Productivity growth over the 2008-20 period averaged just 0.5 percent a year, or 0.2 percent from 2007 to the pre-pandemic year of 2019.”

While this may explain the current economic strife of the UK to an extent, its findings do not prove that Brexit has had no negative economic impact.

Economics editor for the Sunday Times David Smith wrote: “Brexit has given the UK lower growth, higher prices (before the inflation surge) and a significantly weaker pound. Anyone who suggests otherwise takes you for a fool.”

Mr Smith pointed to a Centre for European Reform study which compared the UK as it is now, to a “Doppelgänger UK”, a model of the country in which Brexit did not happen.

DON’T MISS: Keir Starmer told to offer another Brexit vote to ‘win next election’ [REVEAL]
Starmer trying to ‘recast himself as Mr Brexit’ is ‘almost laughable’ [INSIGHT]
City defies Brexit gloomsters to outgun EU and French rivals [ANALYSIS]

According to this study, The economy has lost 5 per cent as a result of Brexit – equivalent to an annual loss of more than £120 billion.

The UK has also done worse than its doppelgänger when it comes to investment, with 13.7 percent less, as well as 13.6 percent less trade.

Services trade in the real UK meanwhile was 7.9 percent higher than the doppelgänger.

Mr Smith also pointed to a study by the Resolution Foundation and the London School of Economics, which found that real wages will be £470 a year lower as a result of leaving the bloc.

Source: Read Full Article